Transformasi Evaluasi Kinerja Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia: Dari Akuntabilitas Administratif Menuju Evaluasi Reflektif dan Berbasis Pembelajaran

Vandasari Vandasari

Abstract


This study examines the transformation of performance evaluation in environmental governance in Indonesia from an administrative accountability paradigm toward a reflective and learning-based approach. Using literature review, regulatory review, and conceptual synthesis, the study identifies a structural gap between the normative function of evaluation as a policy-learning instrument and its dominant use as a document-based accountability mechanism. The findings show that current evaluation practice is still driven by compliance, scoring, and reporting, creating a performance paradox in which improving indicators do not necessarily signal substantive environmental improvement. A phased reform is proposed through logic model integration, causal analysis, follow-up mechanisms, and evaluator capacity building. Transforming evaluation into a reflective instrument is essential to strengthen adaptive governance and improve sustainable environmental management

Keywords


reflective evaluation; policy learning; environmental governance; performance paradox; logic model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, W., Kilvington, M., and Horn, C. (2001). Learning for Environmental Management. Environmental Management, 27 (2), 227-243.

Argyris, C., and Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley.

Argyris, C., and Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Addison-Wesley.

Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Public Administration Review, 63 (5), 586-606.

Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation. (2018). National Evaluation System Report.

Deviani, N. A. (2021). Implementasi sistem akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah pada pemerintah daerah dan implikasinya terhadap kinerja. Jurnal Praja, 8 (1), 35-48.

DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147-160.

Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (6th ed.). Routledge.

Goldman, I., Porter, S., Crous, W., Fischer, C., Gounou, A., Chirau, T., et al. (2018). Developing South Africa's National Evaluation Policy and System. African Evaluation Journal, 6 (1), 1-12.

Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69 (1), 3-19.

IMPAQ International. (2019). Evaluation for Use: Lessons from Policy and Program Learning.

Kementerian Dalam Negeri. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 86 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Perencanaan, Pengendalian, dan Evaluasi Pembangunan Daerah.

Kementerian PANRB. (2020). Pedoman Reformasi Birokrasi dan Penguatan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Pemerintah.

Kementerian PANRB. (2021). Peraturan Menteri PANRB Nomor 88 Tahun 2021 tentang Evaluasi Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.

Kubera, J. (2018). Reflective Practice in Evaluation. Sage.

Lembaga Administrasi Negara. (2018). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik.

Lembaga Administrasi Negara. (2019). Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik dan Pembelajaran Organisasi.

Palenga, M. (2017). Implementasi SAKIP di Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Manajemen Publik, 7(2), 170-185.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Purnomo, A. H. (2023). Evaluasi Reflektif Sebagai Pendekatan Pembelajaran Program dalam Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 5 (2), 108-120.

Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.

Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 8 Tahun 2008 tentang Tahapan, Tata Cara Penyusunan, Pengendalian dan Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Rencana Pembangunan Daerah.

Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.

Rittel, H. W. J., and Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in A General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (2), 155-169.

Rogers, P., and Macfarlan, A. (2020). Theory-Based Evaluation: From Logic Model to Learning.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books.

Stame, N. (2004). Theory-Based Evaluation and Types Of Complexity. Evaluation, 10 (1), 58-76.

Syachbrani, W., and Akbar, R. (2013). Implementasi SAKIP di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 63-69.

UNDP and UNICEF. (2022). Evaluation for Learning in Asia and the Pacific.

Van Thiel, S., and Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The Performance Paradox in The Public Sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25 (3), 267-281.

Van Veen, S., Van der Knaap, P., and Mak, J. (2016). Learning from evaluation in public organizations.

Winarno, B. (2017). Kebijakan publik: Teori dan Proses. CAPS.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52364/zona.v10i1.230

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.