Penataan jalur pejalan kaki untuk mendukung Green Campus di kampus Universitas Diponegoro Tembalang
Abstract
One approach to realizing a green campus is by providing a comfortable space for non-motorized transportation. Walking is the cheapest, low-emission non-motorized transportation, so accessibility to pedestrians should be prioritized. Providing more space for pedestrians which will change the orientation of road infrastructure that has been more pro-motorized. Diponegoro University, which is the green campus pilot project of the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, has complete pedestrian paths. However, the current condition is still not appropriately utilised because the movement of academicians is still using motorized vehicles. To preserving the orientation of the existing green campus, it is necessary to evaluate the pedestrian path that is suitable by regulation physically. The results of research on pedestrian paths at the Undip Tembalang Campus indicate that it is required to repair and change the road design that is related to the comfort of people walking, and affects how pedestrian paths are used. Official regulations and policies from the campus will also have an impact on motorized vehicle use. Changes to empower those in the campus environment and energy-efficient actions are carried out by improving the accessibility of campus residents to use public transportation and non-motorized transportation to campus.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cambra, P., & Moura, F. (2020). How does walkability change relate to walking behavior change? Effects of a street improvement in pedestrian volumes and walking experience. Journal of Transport and Health, 16(November 2019), 100797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100797.
Corazza, M. V., Di Mascio, P., & Moretti, L. (2016). Managing sidewalk pavement maintenance: A case study to increase pedestrian safety. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 3(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2016.04.001.
D’Orso, G., & Migliore, M. (2020). A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 82(July 2019), 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102555.
Göçer, Ö., Göçer, K., Özcan, B., Bakovic, M., & Kıraç, M. F. (2019). Pedestrian tracking in outdoor spaces of a suburban university campus for the investigation of occupancy patterns. Sustainable Cities and Society, 45(November 2018), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.006.
Pedoman Perencanaan, Penyediaan, dan Pemanfaatan Prasarana dan Sarana Jaringan Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Perkotaan, 2013 Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia 8 (2014). http://pug-pupr.pu.go.id/_uploads/Produk_Pengaturan/Permen PUPR No 03-2014.pdf.
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., do Paço, A., & Brandli, L. (2015). Putting sustainable development in practice: Campus greening as a tool for institutional sustainability efforts. In Sustainability in Higher Education. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100367-1.00001-9.
Marrone, P., Orsini, F., Asdrubali, F., & Guattari, C. (2018). Environmental performance of universities: Proposal for implementing campus urban morphology as an evaluation parameter in Green Metric. Sustainable Cities and Society, 42(July), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.07.012.
Murwadi, H., & Dewancker, B. (2017). Study of quassessment model for campus pedestrian ways, case study: Sidewalk of the University of Lampung. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122285.
Rafiemanzelat, R., Emadi, M. I., & Kamali, A. J. (2017). City sustainability: the influence of walkability on built environments. Transportation Research Procedia, 24, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.074.
Ridhosari, B., & Rahman, A. (2020). Carbon footprint assessment at Universitas Pertamina from the scope of electricity, transportation, and waste generation: Toward a green campus and promotion of environmental sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 119172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119172.
Setyowati, E., Harani, A. R., & Falah, Y. N. (2013). The Application of Pedestrian Ways Design Concepts as an Implementation of Sustainable Urban Open Spaces. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.364.
Shamsuddin, S., Hassan, N. R. A., & Bilyamin, S. F. I. (2012). Walkable Environment in Increasing the Liveability of a City. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50(July), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.025.
Soni, N., & Soni, N. (2016). Benefits of pedestrianization and warrants to pedestrianize an area. Land Use Policy, 57(5), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.009.
Wimala, M., Akmalah, E., Irawati, I., & Sururi, M. R. (2016). Overcoming the Obstacles to Green Campus Implementation in Indonesia. June.
Yilmaz, H., Yilmaz, S., Yavaş, M., Mutlu, E., & Koç, A. (2016). Climate-sensitive Pavement Modelling for Pedestrian Ways. Procedia Engineering, 169, 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.10.050.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52364/zona.v5i1.6
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: http://pelantarpress.co.id/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.